One reason I didn't buy it though is my car is super quick and cannot get traction with the 2.62s, I'm not convinced it will be any faster with the 3.09s. In theory I get it, it has to be quicker...but I dunno.
I don't follow conventional opinion on the subject.
I have run a few cars when I was stock that switched to 3.09 or had a 3.09 already.
Same day same lane with back to back passes it has not yet been proven to me they are quicker. As for 60' my 2.62 car isn't missing much and would make up the difference by the 330' or the 660' .
Always out moph the other car also.
Now that the car has a tune (due to cat recall) it is more difficult to compare.
You could compare BMason and my car as they are pretty close in set up. Mine is heavier by 150-200lbs. I think our best 60' is the same at 1.45 so no advantage to the 3.09 there. These comparisons are obviously in low DA and in BMasson's case across the country at different times of year.
I just picked up a new 2.62 for a deal because it was taken out to swap to 3.09.
The guy is a local that I know from the track.
He asked me why I was going back to 2.62.
The look on his face was priceless when I told him my car has the original 2.62 in it and after roughly 1200+ passes I wanted a spare.