I am going by what he said in the ad. Resently Tim Godbee said he thinks the one seat cars are faster. I think his white car is way ahead of where my car was at the time (based on the number of runs and mileage). Of course we have learned some things. So that is some of it, I suppose. But, yes it is strong. So, just maybe, they made sure the one seat cars got culled engines. If I worked there and had anything to do with it that is what I would have done.
One other thing. I was corresponding with Tim K and he knew I was taking my customer ordered one seat car straight to the drag strip to run and run and run it ..........S o, just maybe.....
Admittedly, that's possible... but I think with them all rolling out the door, why would they bother? It's a one off - once all the huffing and puffing is done I can't see corporate rolling over the expenditure of effort for that. Or the guys on the line. Why would they care?
EDIT: it's not like there were 20,000 sitting unclaimed on show room floors and whether they moved or not was going to be determined by how well some of the first ones did when tested. They were almost all sold before they were pieced together. However, could absolutely see FCA dumping "marginal performing" engines on the line, but picking out what cars they go into would be stupid (they could be sued then). "Why, sir, did you pick my clients car for the weak underperforming motor? Because he's Black, a woman, a trump supporter, a biden supporter, a transvestite, a moderator on hellcatforum.org?" A far better plan is just leave them in the pipeline and let them go where they go. There has to be a cut off, 1 HP below the cut off, engine is shit canned, one HP above, on you go to assembly. It's not a giant conspiracy; just corporate procedure and inforcing the rules. (lol, now, on the other hand, find evidence that motors below the cut off were shunted back on the pipeline because "weren't enough" passing motors or like that, and we're off to the races)
