I DO NOT like the wheels but that's easy to fix and those probably won't be production anyway.
Yeah, that's a matter of taste. I'm not a fan of them being so big (21") or the center parts but I quite like the outer ring part.
I do like the stagger, rear tires are huge.
Absolutely. 325 all around? Yes, please.
Interior is interesting. No real "buttons" per say but just touch items. Would be cool if they have haptic feed back. The tech will likely be pretty amazing in the instrumentation, but that's a double edged sword since people are already too distracted when driving as it is.
And that's where this crap needs to stop, I think. It
looks nice, but haptic feedback isn't enough. There needs to be texture. Every car I've ever driven, I could - and did - adjust things like cabin temperature, defrost, fan speeds... without taking my eye off the road. You can stick an arm out, and find the right controls by feel once you're a little familiar with that particular car. I don't mind the touch interfaces for the locks and windows, but they need some kind of raised ring around them so you can feel for them. Same goes for dash buttons.
As of today "most" electric cars look like complete ass in my opinion. Boring vanilla throw away appliances.
You're not wrong. I get that emotional response to most cars. Euroblobs is what I call them. I get that aerodynamic efficiency is important... to a degree. But when that becomes the most important factor, all cars look the same. This thing at least looks... well, honestly, it looks an awful lot like the current Charger with a Challenger front-end.
I dig that it's AWD and we all know it'll likely have a ton of horse power, although I'll say it now, you'll get some low amount to start and each tier is a higher cost monthly subscription.
Maybe. I know manufacturers want that, but I seriously doubt the North American market will support it for another couple decades. Rich folk buying $300k Astin Martins won't mind coughing up a subscription for don't-ever-use-it features. But blue-jeans-wearing middle-class grunts? Doubt it. I'll pay for performance one time. After that, screw off.
Fake exhaust sound has got to go. That's just lame.
There's
got to be an off button for that.
But here's a weird question that occurred to me last night. In the videos of the car moving, there are two noises. There's the "cat roar" noise that is so stupid it pegs the stupid-o-meter. But there's also a weird sci-fi low-pitch background noise. I figure it's probably just sound in the presentation. Like a bunch of monks going "om". But what if that's actually produced by the car? I think I still don't like it if it is, but... I'm not 100% sure I don't.
I find it so odd quite a few people making comments on the socials that "we don't have a choice" when it comes to EV. Of course we do. Are people that brain washed to think there isn't a choice?
You know how removable batteries and earphone jacks are totally a valid choice in smartphones in 2022? That's what is meant by "don't have a choice". You really don't because outside pressures are making your consumer choice statistically irrelevant to manufacturers. That said, sometimes - and I'm not saying this is necessarily one of them - consumers are just too bull-headed to do the right thing. Then we get legally-mandated motorcycle helmets, removal of asbestos, and no more lead paint in kids' toys. Again, I'm not commenting on if the EV/ICE transition is one of those moments, but I hope we can agree that Joe Consumer is the same moron who shops for the cheapest airline seat and then is shocked that the seat is 16" wide and they're not allowed carry-on luggage that doesn't fit in their nostril.
Green energy aside, the US can't save the world's environment on its own.
No, but the US (and every other major country) sure can screw it up on their own. It takes
everyone to stop peeing in the pool for it to not be disgusting.
We're also not ready for all EV and won't be in at least the next 20 years. There's not enough infrastructure, standards aren't set, and too much electricity is still produced from fossil fuels. It's concerning to me those issues aren't being discussed.
That's complicated. The "we" in "we're not ready" varies. Some people/places are ready. Apartment-dwellers? Not ready. Long-distance drivers? Not ready. But the big portion of drivers who can garage-charge their car once a week because they - like most people - drive under 30mi a day? They may be ready.
And electricity production from fossil fuels? Well, that's interesting because it's not a given that EV conversion will immediately cause a significant increase in fossil-to-electricity burning. That's because most EV charging is done off-peak hours. The power plants are still spun up today, burning fuel, but the electricity isn't being used. Sure, some plants get shut down off-peak, but not most... which is why the supply is such that you can get off-peak pricing. So... if we stop burning the gas in the tank and we start using (some) currently wasted electricity, there's a decent argument that there's improvement. That said... it's all math, and it's not clear what the real-world results will be. But... it's not clear-cut bad and it's not clear-cut good. Despite what "the sides" want to say.
But yeah, those issues are being discussed.